Single entity with brand-level divisions
Divisions are brands, not subsidiaries.
ADR-002 — Single entity with brand-level divisions
Context#
The original intent was a holding company with subsidiaries, modelled on Alphabet.
Cost of that structure in India, per entity: roughly ₹6,000–15,000 to incorporate, and ₹25,000–40,000 annually in compliance — statutory audit, ROC filings, board resolutions, DIN KYC, separate returns. A parent plus three subsidiaries would consume more per year than the business has earned in total.
Relevant precedent: Google operated as a single company from 1998 to 2015. Alphabet was created seventeen years in, at roughly $75B revenue, because several businesses needed separate boards and capital. The structure followed the scale; it did not produce it.
Decision#
One legal entity. Divisions exist at the brand and marketing layer only — Orvenath Studio and Orvenath Labs are operating units, not companies.
App store listings, proposals, email signatures, and the website all present the division structure. This delivers the full appearance of a group at approximately 5% of the cost.
Consequences#
- Full professional presentation at near-zero structural overhead
- One set of books, one return
- Restructuring into a real group later is straightforward; unwinding four entities would not be
- No liability separation between divisions — accepted at current scale
When to revisit#
When two divisions could each independently raise capital, or when a division's liability profile diverges materially from the other's.